[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54894850.5000603@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:31:28 -0800
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Hubert Sokolowski <h.sokolowski@....edu.pl>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if
ndo_fdb_dump is defined.
On 12/10/14, 11:37 AM, Hubert Sokolowski wrote:
> This change restores the semantic that was present
> before 5e6d243587990a588143b9da3974833649595587
> "bridge: netlink dump interface at par with brctl"
> on how ndo_dflt_fdb_dump is called.
> This semantic is still used for add and del operations
> so let's keep it consistent.
> Driver can still call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump from inside
> its own fdb_dump routine when needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hubert Sokolowski <h.sokolowski@....edu.pl>
> ---
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index eaa057f..a9e5c37 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -2692,10 +2692,11 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> idx);
> }
>
> - idx = ndo_dflt_fdb_dump(skb, cb, dev, NULL, idx);
> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump)
> idx = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump(skb, cb, bdev, dev,
> idx);
> + else
> + idx = ndo_dflt_fdb_dump(skb, cb, dev, NULL, idx);
>
> cops = NULL;
> }
I think commit
"5e6d243587990a588143b9da3974833649595587 "bridge: netlink dump
interface at par with brctl" tried to make sure even the dflt entries
(ie dev->uc and dev->mc) were also printed in the below case. ie the
'self' entries in the below output.
# ./bridge fdb show brport eth1
02:00:00:12:01:02 vlan 0 master br0 permanent
00:17:42:8a:b4:05 vlan 0 master br0 permanent
00:17:42:8a:b4:07 self permanent
33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent
Am guessing reverting the patch is going to make the 'self' entries in
the above output to go away.
Can you please confirm ?.
Also, if i hear your concern correctly, for bridge ports that implement
ndo_fdb_dump, with commit 5e6d243587990a588143b9da3974833649595587, we
will get two entries for each 'self' entry above.
Can you also paste sample output for that ?.
Thanks,
Roopa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists