netdev - Re: [netdev01] registration inconsistency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <548AE9AF.90902@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:12:15 -0500
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC:	netdev01@...ts.netfilter.org, Brenda Butler <bjb@...atatu.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...colour.net>
Subject: Re: [netdev01] registration inconsistency

On 12/12/14 07:23, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 06:42 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
>> For workshops, you should go ahead and invite people you want.
>> If you want us to give codes to some people (means either they dont
>> have  to pay or get discounts) then ping bjb and/or myself.
>
> No no, I don't think any (many) people will need a discount.
>
>> I am not sure how we distinguish invited people vs not-invited. It
>> would be nice to be able to do so.
>> One way is to do what the IETF does; provide color coded badges?
>> Also:
>> Do you think we need to change the language on the web site
>> to avoid any confusion?
>
> I think the confusion is that the CFP and the website say the conference
> is going to be be 50% speakers and 50% invitation: "The netdev
> conference this year is structured to be 50/50 by-invitation and talk
> submission"
>
> Looking back at this, I think you meant that the *talks* were going to
> be 50/50 like that, but some people have contacted me about that they
> thought *attendance* was going to be like that. In fact I just glossed
> over it and until now thought the same!
>
> If I'm right that you meant *talks* then I think you should clarify that
> language and even send out a clarification as a reply to the CFP email.
>

I think i got it.
Either a reply or we fix the CFP on the website.
Ccing Richard.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html