[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1412132211260.3229@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:19:55 +0200 (EET)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
<f.wiessner@...rt-weblications.de>
cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.12.33 - BUG xfrm_selector_match+0x25/0x2f6
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
> >> [ 512.485323] CPU: 4 PID: 28142 Comm: vsftpd Not tainted 3.12.33 #5
> >
> > Above "#5" is same as previous oops. It means kernel
> > is not updated. Or you updated only the IPVS modules after
> > applying the both patches?
>
> I did it with make-kpkg --initrd linux_image which only rebuilt the modules,
> correct. I can retry with make clean before building the package
I just tested PASV and PORT with 3.12.33 including
both patches (seq adj fix + ip_route_me_harder fix) and do not
see any crashes in nf_ct_seqadj_set. If you still have problem
with FTP send me more info offlist.
> > You can also try without FTP tests to see if there
> > are oopses in xfrm, so that we can close this topic and then
> > to continue for the FTP problem on IPVS lists without
> > bothering non-IPVS people.
> >
>
> yeah, it seems that the xfrm issue is away.
Thanks for the confirmation!
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists