lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54907884.2040502@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:23:00 -0500
From:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: How to fix CHECK warning: testing a 'safe expression'

netdev maintainers,

I got a comment to address CHECK warning and wondering how to address 
'warning: testing a 'safe expression' which appears when using
IS_ERR_OR_NULL(foo)

where foo is defined as

struct foo_type *foo;

The foo get assigned only NULL or ERR_PTR(error code). So I believe the 
usage is correct. But then how do I make the CHECK happy of its usage?

I have tried doing a grep on the current usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() and 
found 276 of them causes this warning in the v3.18 version of the kernel 
that I am using

$ grep -r "warning: testing a 'safe expression" * | wc -l
276

1) Can someone explain what this warning means?

2) Is it acceptable to post patches to netdev list with this warning?

3) if not, how this is expected to be fixed? Any example usage to fix 
this warning will be helpful.

Thanks in advance for
-- 
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ