netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:10:39 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	mst@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support

On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 13:20 -0500, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> Split IPv6 support for UFO into its own feature similiar to TSO.
> This will later allow us to re-enable UFO support for virtio-net
> devices.
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 6c8b6f6..8538b67 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ enum {
>  
>  	SKB_GSO_MPLS = 1 << 12,
>  
> +	SKB_GSO_UDP6 = 1 << 13

It seems like it would be cleaner to use the names SKB_GSO_UDPV{4,6},
similarly to SKB_GSO_TCPV{4,6}.

>  };
>  
>  #if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 945bbd0..fa4d2ee 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
[...]
> @@ -5952,24 +5958,21 @@ static netdev_features_t netdev_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
[...]
> +	/* UFO also needs checksumming */
> +	if ((features & NETIF_F_UFO) && !(features & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM) &&
> +					!(features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM)) {

You can use !(features & NETIF_F_V4_CSUM) instead of the last two terms.

> +		netdev_dbg(dev,
> +			   "Dropping NETIF_F_UFO since no checksum offload features.\n");
> +		features &= ~NETIF_F_UFO;
> +	}
> +	if ((features & NETIF_F_UFO6) && !(features & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM) &&
> +					 !(features & NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM)) {
[...]

Similarly you can use !(features & NETIF_F_V6_CSUM) instead of the last
two terms.

Aside from those minor points, this looks fine.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)