[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyauxJFoK-ABmT+Zd3-oEV0d_FCXPLXrS_3yMG24Fe=8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:13:08 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netlink: Don't reorder loads/stores before marking
mmap netlink frame as available
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> index ef5f77b..2662821 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> @@ -550,9 +550,9 @@ static enum nl_mmap_status netlink_get_status(const struct nl_mmap_hdr *hdr)
> static void netlink_set_status(struct nl_mmap_hdr *hdr,
> enum nl_mmap_status status)
> {
> + smp_mb();
> hdr->nm_status = status;
> flush_dcache_page(pgvec_to_page(hdr));
> - smp_wmb();
> }
If this is performance-critical code (I have no idea), then a better
idea might be to use
smp_store_release(&hdr->nm_status, status);
instead of using explicit memory barriers. That's going to generally
be much cheaper than a memory barrier.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists