netdev - Re: Re:Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000e in linux-3.18.0: some potential bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1419079667.2461.92.camel@jtkirshe-mobl.home>
Date:	Sat, 20 Dec 2014 04:47:47 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	白家驹 <baijiaju1990@....com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	e1000-devel <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Re:Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000e in linux-3.18.0: some
 potential bugs

On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 20:44 +0800, 白家驹 wrote:
> Thank for the reply!
> 
> For the first reply:
> I let some functions fail on purpose to test error handling code, and
> then run the driver in reality as well as monitor the function calls
> in runtime.
> The results are in my report. 
> 
> For the second reply:
> I admit you are right, and my code style need to be improved.

Adding netdev and e1000-devel mailing lists back onto the CC, since 白家
驹 removed them in his reply.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)