netdev - Re: [PATCH] e1000 in linux-3.18.0: a potential bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54957956.30803@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:27:50 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>, todd.fujinaka@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	linux.nics@...el.com, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000 in linux-3.18.0: a potential bug

Hello.

On 12/20/2014 10:50 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:

> I have actually tested e1000 driver on the real hardware(Intel 82540EM PCI
> Gigabit Ethernet Controller), and find a potential bug:
> The target file is drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c, which is
> used to build e1000.ko.

> (1) In the normal process, netif_napi_add is called in e1000_probe, but
> netif_napi_del is not called in e1000_remove. However, many other ethernet
> card drivers call them in pairs, even in the error handling paths, such as
> r8169 and igb.

> Meanwhile, I also write the patch to fix the bug. I have run the patch on
> the hardware, it can work normally and fix the above bug.

    You didn't sign off on your patch, so it can't be applied.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html