netdev - [RFC PATCH 06/17] fib_trie: Optimize fib_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141222174130.1119.85241.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20>
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:41:30 -0800
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/17] fib_trie: Optimize fib_find_node

This patch makes use of the same features I made use of for
fib_table_lookup to streamline fib_find_node.  The resultant code should be
smaller and run faster than the original.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
---
 net/ipv4/fib_trie.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index fe2f60a..c182143 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -892,28 +892,34 @@ static void insert_leaf_info(struct hlist_head *head, struct leaf_info *new)
 }
 
 /* rcu_read_lock needs to be hold by caller from readside */
-
 static struct tnode *fib_find_node(struct trie *t, u32 key)
 {
 	struct tnode *n = rcu_dereference_rtnl(t->trie);
-	int pos = 0;
 
-	while (n && IS_TNODE(n)) {
-		if (tkey_sub_equals(n->key, pos, n->pos-pos, key)) {
-			pos = n->pos + n->bits;
-			n = tnode_get_child_rcu(n,
-						tkey_extract_bits(key,
-								  n->pos,
-								  n->bits));
-		} else
+	while (n) {
+		unsigned long index = get_index(key, n);
+
+		/* This bit of code is a bit tricky but it combines multiple
+		 * checks into a single check.  The prefix consists of the
+		 * prefix plus zeros for the bits in the cindex. The index
+		 * is the difference between the key and this value.  From
+		 * this we can actually derive several pieces of data.
+		 *   if !(index >> bits)
+		 *     we know the value is cindex
+		 *   else
+		 *     we have a mismatch in skip bits and failed
+		 */
+		if (index >> n->bits)
+			return NULL;
+
+		/* we have found a leaf. Prefixes have already been compared */
+		if (IS_LEAF(n))
 			break;
-	}
-	/* Case we have found a leaf. Compare prefixes */
 
-	if (n != NULL && IS_LEAF(n) && tkey_equals(key, n->key))
-		return n;
+		n = rcu_dereference_rtnl(n->child[index]);
+	}
 
-	return NULL;
+	return n;
 }
 
 static void trie_rebalance(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html