[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sig6ej1t.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:50:54 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipw2200: select CFG80211_WEXT
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> writes:
> On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 08:52 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> writes:
>>
>> > Commit 24a0aa212ee2 ("cfg80211: make WEXT compatibility unselectable")
>> > made it impossible to depend on CFG80211_WEXT. It does still allow to
>> > select that symbol. (Yes, the commit summary is confusing.)
>> >
>> > So make IPW2200 select CFG80211_WEXT, so that the ipw2200 driver can be
>> > built again.
>>
>> I think the last sentence is a bit misleading (this isn't a compilation
>> error, right?)
>
> No, it's not a compilation error.
>
> The reasoning here is that all code hidden behind a Kconfig symbol that
> cannot be set will, in practice, never be built. Sure, there are hoops
> one can jump through to try to bypass the generated .config, but no one
> should have to do that.
>
>> and I would like to clarify it like this:
>>
>> "So make IPW2200 select CFG80211_WEXT, so that the ipw2200 driver can be
>> enabled in config again."
>>
>> Does that look ok?
>
> I understand the confusion my text might cause, so I'm fine with your
> amendment.
Thanks for checking. I'll modify the commit log and apply it to
wireless-drivers.git.
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists