netdev - Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8761d19j6z.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:11:16 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc:	qca_vkondrat@....qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	wil6210@....qualcomm.com,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings

Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com> writes:

> Oh, sorry, I forgot the word wrap (after change a new pc). I shall send
> patch v2 for it.

While at it, could you also please simplify the title. You don't have to
put the full directory there, it just makes it more difficult to read.
This should be enough:

wil6210: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings

I see quite a few patches with titles like 'drivers: net: wireless: ath:
fix foo'. Where an earth is that coming from? Bad documentation
somewhere?

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html