netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] socket: Allow external sockets to use socket syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <549DBE25.3040302@fb.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:59:33 -0500
From:	Alex Gartrell <agartrell@...com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] socket: Allow external sockets to use socket
 syscalls

Hello Al,

On 12/26/14 2:56 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:50:23PM -0800, Alex Gartrell wrote:
>> Currently the "is-socket" test for a file compares the ops table pointer,
>> which is static and local to the socket.c.  Instead, this adds a flag for
>> private_data_is_socket.  This is an exceptionally long commit message for a
>> two-line patch.
>
> NAK.  Don't crap into struct file, please.
>

I don't disagree with your sentiment here.  Is the additional f_op 
approach less gross or do you have something else in mind?

Thanks,
-- 
Alex Gartrell <agartrell@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html