[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3LdT4mfE72fmA3b3iG=-b9iP9MXHfAJMBwqFzfYyC1pebc8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:21:33 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, gleb@...udius-systems.com,
avi@...udius-systems.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] ixgbe: Add a RETA query command to VF-PF
channel API
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Vlad Zolotarov
<vladz@...udius-systems.com> wrote:
> 82599 VFs and PF share the same RSS redirection table (RETA). Therefore we
> just return it for all VFs.
>
> RETA table is an array of 32 registers and the maximum number of registers
> that may be delivered in a single VF-PF channel command is 15. Therefore
> we will deliver the whole table in 3 steps: 12, 12 and 8 registers in each
> step correspondingly. Thus this patch does the following:
>
> - Adds a new API version (to specify a new commands set).
> - Adds the IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_[0,1,2] commands to the VF-PF commands set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h | 6 +++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
> index a5cb755..c1123d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ enum ixgbe_pfvf_api_rev {
> ixgbe_mbox_api_10, /* API version 1.0, linux/freebsd VF driver */
> ixgbe_mbox_api_20, /* API version 2.0, solaris Phase1 VF driver */
> ixgbe_mbox_api_11, /* API version 1.1, linux/freebsd VF driver */
> + ixgbe_mbox_api_12, /* API version 1.2, linux/freebsd VF driver */
> /* This value should always be last */
> ixgbe_mbox_api_unknown, /* indicates that API version is not known */
> };
> @@ -91,6 +92,11 @@ enum ixgbe_pfvf_api_rev {
> /* mailbox API, version 1.1 VF requests */
> #define IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES 0x09 /* get queue configuration */
>
> +/* mailbox API, version 1.2 VF requests */
> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_0 0x0a /* get RETA[0..11] */
> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_1 0x0b /* get RETA[12..23] */
> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_2 0x0c /* get RETA[24..31] */
> +
> /* GET_QUEUES return data indices within the mailbox */
> #define IXGBE_VF_TX_QUEUES 1 /* number of Tx queues supported */
> #define IXGBE_VF_RX_QUEUES 2 /* number of Rx queues supported */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> index c76ba90..84db1a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static s32 ixgbe_set_vf_lpe(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
> #endif /* CONFIG_FCOE */
> switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
> /*
> * Version 1.1 supports jumbo frames on VFs if PF has
> * jumbo frames enabled which means legacy VFs are
> @@ -894,6 +895,7 @@ static int ixgbe_negotiate_vf_api(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> switch (api) {
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_10:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
> adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api = api;
> return 0;
> default:
> @@ -917,6 +919,7 @@ static int ixgbe_get_vf_queues(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_20:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
> break;
> default:
> return -1;
> @@ -944,6 +947,29 @@ static int ixgbe_get_vf_queues(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ixgbe_get_vf_reta(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> + u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf, int reta_offset_dw,
> + size_t dwords)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> + int i;
> + u32 *reta = &msgbuf[1];
> +
> + /* verify the PF is supporting the correct API */
> + switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
A switch statement is overkill for a single case. It would be far
simpler to just have
if (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api != ixgbe_mbox_api_12)
return -EPERM;
Later on, if there are multiple API's or future API's that also
support this, then we could move to a case statement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists