| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54A2FE72.1080003@cloudius-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:35:14 +0200
From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, gleb@...udius-systems.com,
avi@...udius-systems.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] ixgbe: Add a RETA query command to VF-PF
channel API
On 12/30/14 21:30, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 21:28 +0200, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>> On 12/30/14 21:21, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Vlad Zolotarov
>>> <vladz@...udius-systems.com> wrote:
>>>> 82599 VFs and PF share the same RSS redirection table (RETA). Therefore we
>>>> just return it for all VFs.
>>>>
>>>> RETA table is an array of 32 registers and the maximum number of registers
>>>> that may be delivered in a single VF-PF channel command is 15. Therefore
>>>> we will deliver the whole table in 3 steps: 12, 12 and 8 registers in each
>>>> step correspondingly. Thus this patch does the following:
>>>>
>>>> - Adds a new API version (to specify a new commands set).
>>>> - Adds the IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_[0,1,2] commands to the VF-PF commands set.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h | 6 +++++
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
>>>> index a5cb755..c1123d9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h
>>>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ enum ixgbe_pfvf_api_rev {
>>>> ixgbe_mbox_api_10, /* API version 1.0, linux/freebsd VF driver */
>>>> ixgbe_mbox_api_20, /* API version 2.0, solaris Phase1 VF driver */
>>>> ixgbe_mbox_api_11, /* API version 1.1, linux/freebsd VF driver */
>>>> + ixgbe_mbox_api_12, /* API version 1.2, linux/freebsd VF driver */
>>>> /* This value should always be last */
>>>> ixgbe_mbox_api_unknown, /* indicates that API version is not known */
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -91,6 +92,11 @@ enum ixgbe_pfvf_api_rev {
>>>> /* mailbox API, version 1.1 VF requests */
>>>> #define IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES 0x09 /* get queue configuration */
>>>>
>>>> +/* mailbox API, version 1.2 VF requests */
>>>> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_0 0x0a /* get RETA[0..11] */
>>>> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_1 0x0b /* get RETA[12..23] */
>>>> +#define IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA_2 0x0c /* get RETA[24..31] */
>>>> +
>>>> /* GET_QUEUES return data indices within the mailbox */
>>>> #define IXGBE_VF_TX_QUEUES 1 /* number of Tx queues supported */
>>>> #define IXGBE_VF_RX_QUEUES 2 /* number of Rx queues supported */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
>>>> index c76ba90..84db1a5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
>>>> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static s32 ixgbe_set_vf_lpe(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_FCOE */
>>>> switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
>>>> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
>>>> /*
>>>> * Version 1.1 supports jumbo frames on VFs if PF has
>>>> * jumbo frames enabled which means legacy VFs are
>>>> @@ -894,6 +895,7 @@ static int ixgbe_negotiate_vf_api(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>>>> switch (api) {
>>>> case ixgbe_mbox_api_10:
>>>> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
>>>> adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api = api;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> default:
>>>> @@ -917,6 +919,7 @@ static int ixgbe_get_vf_queues(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>>>> switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
>>>> case ixgbe_mbox_api_20:
>>>> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
>>>> break;
>>>> default:
>>>> return -1;
>>>> @@ -944,6 +947,29 @@ static int ixgbe_get_vf_queues(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int ixgbe_get_vf_reta(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>>>> + u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf, int reta_offset_dw,
>>>> + size_t dwords)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + u32 *reta = &msgbuf[1];
>>>> +
>>>> + /* verify the PF is supporting the correct API */
>>>> + switch (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api) {
>>>> + case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + return -EPERM;
>>>> + }
>>> A switch statement is overkill for a single case. It would be far
>>> simpler to just have
>>>
>>> if (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api != ixgbe_mbox_api_12)
>>> return -EPERM;
>>>
>>> Later on, if there are multiple API's or future API's that also
>>> support this, then we could move to a case statement.
>> I thought about it to but decided to make it future-proof. NP. Will make
>> it an "if" in a non-RFC series. Thanks.
>>
> Thanks fine, and if you CC me on the non-RFC series,
Sure thing I will! ;) After such a lightning fast review I'll CC u for
all my future net patches! ;)
> I will pick them up
> (and make sure that Greg Rose has a chance to review them).
Cool. Then I'll cook the series first think tomorrow morning.
Thanks a lot, Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists