netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: Do not set skb ignore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALnjE+qr4vvnxNX=bkyQ0H=8WW2Qgsbqqzxm16hop3PRx6-O=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Jan 2015 14:44:38 -0800
From:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: Do not set skb ignore_df

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>> Tunnel transmit code clear this bit, so setting ignore_df has
>> no effect.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
>
> Is it actually right for the bit to be cleared though? As discussed in
> the previous thread on tunnel MTU handling, I think that fragmentation
> should be done as a very last resort.

ok, I missed the discussion, I will send another patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html