[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A8DBF4.4050202@lwfinger.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:21:40 -0600
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>,
Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
CC: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...rom.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: brcmsmac: dma: Remove some unused functions
On 01/03/2015 06:47 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
> dma_txflush() dma_txsuspended()
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/dma.c | 19 -------------------
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/dma.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 21 deletions(-)
Just because file dma.c is involved, it does not need to be, nor should it be in
the subject line. You could specify the driver names in the file tree after
wireless. In this instance, one possible subject would be "brcm80211: brcmsmac:
Remove some unused functions". On the other hand, if you look at "git log" to
see past patches, the driver maintainers even leave off the brcm80211 part, thus
to match them, the subject should be "brcmsmac: Remove some unused functions".
As was suggested earlier, you need to look at the precedents. Keeping a uniform
method of patch naming helps when looking for patches in the git log.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists