netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if ndo_fdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54AA89F0.9090009@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:56:16 +0000
From:	Hubert Sokolowski <hubert.sokolowski@...el.com>
To:	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if
 ndo_fdb_dump is defined.


On 19/12/14 16:32, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 12/19/14, 7:17 AM, Hubert Sokolowski wrote:
>> On 18/12/14 22:32, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the latency (head-buried-in-sand in effect)
>>> On 12/17/14 11:18, Hubert Sokolowski wrote:
>>>> I have just prepared a patch where I dump uc/mc for bridge devices
>>>> by looking at (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE), so I have same results
>>>> as without my changes. This should satisfy Jamal and Roopa.
>>>> I could send it as v3 of my patch along with the results if you are
>>>> interested.
>>> Please do. If you satisfy Vlad's goals then we are all happy.
>> Posted as v3, please review.
>> There is still open question I asked sometime ago but never got explained.
>> It is about the new filter_dev parameter that was added to ndo_fdb_dump:
>>          int                     (*ndo_fdb_dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>                                                  struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>                                                  struct net_device *dev,
>>                                                  struct net_device *filter_dev,
>>                                                  int idx);
>>
>> When we call this function for a device, dev pointer is passed as the filter_dev:
>>                  if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump)
>>                          idx = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump(skb, cb, bdev, dev,
>>                                                              idx);
> seems like these calls should be fixed. bdev is really dev in this case. And filter_dev should be null.
>

Will fix this too and resend the patch as v4.

Thanks,
Hubert

-- 
Hubert Sokolowski                  Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html