netdev - Re: route/max_size sysctl in ipv4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:56:26 -0800
From:	Ani Sinha <ani@...sta.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: route/max_size sysctl in ipv4

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:51 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> The sysctl is kept so that scripts reading it don't suddenly stop
> working.  We can't just remove sysctl values.

Interestingly, one of our scripts did break. It broke because now this
sysctl is only available in the global net namespace and not in the
child namespaces. If not breaking scripts is the fundamental logic in
keeping in sysctl intact, would you guys be open to accepting a patch
where we make this sysctl available for all net namespaces?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html