netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQJErdNJrXOOSqEqkbC8524VCH2E9vYL-WdTb_6SGsTwvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:32:52 -0800
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> On 01/06/15 at 07:37pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> Even it works ok, I think this struct layout is ugly.
>> imo would be much easier to read if you replace
>> the whole vxlanhdr with vxlanhdr_gbp
>> or split vxlanhdr into two 32-bit structs.
>> then __packed hacks won't be needed.
>
> The main reason why I merged it into vxlanhdr is for documentation
> purposes and to avoid duplicating the generic VXLAN header for every
> extension. The RCO and GPE extensions would need to duplicate this
> over and over. It gets messy in particular when multiple extensions
> can be used in combination (such as GBP and RCO) which then each
> have their own conflicting header definitions. This way, it is clear
> which extensions are compatible by just looking at the definition
> of the structure.

I'm afraid 'union' style with first u8 flags working as selector
won't work for the case you're describing, but since
                      md.gbp = ntohs(vxh->gbp.policy_id);
    2652:       41 0f b7 55 0a          movzwl 0xa(%r13),%edx
then at least from performance side it's ok at least on x86.
So this _packed stuff is fine, though not pretty.
It's internal header, so we can improve it later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html