[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AnB-hLHpqbznpqrSromDYv+GbW8tut=EC4A9az3Qf+3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:44:16 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: "fugang.duan@...escale.com" <fugang.duan@...escale.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] ARM: imx: add FEC sleep mode callback function
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> The GPR difference between SoCs can be encoded in device tree as well.
> It's pointless to repeat the same code pattern for every single
> platform, that need to set up GPR bits for enabling magic packet wake
> up, while the only difference is the register and bit offset.
>
> The platform code will become quite messy and unmaintainable if every
> device driver dump their GPR register setup code into platform.
>
> Sorry, but it's NACK from me.
This patch has already reached linux-next via Dave's tree as commit
456062b3ec6f5.
Should a revert patch be sent?
Also, this commit causes a build warning in linux-next:
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c:59:20: warning: 'imx6sx_enet_plt_init'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists