[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMiMsHW9Wys2GMhD9CRhU03DF3KZywGQkTWF1sMKn8x+fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:07:57 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
simon.horman@...ronome.com,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v1 01/11] net: flow_table: create interface for
hw match/action tables
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:59 PM, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
>>> +struct sk_buff *net_flow_build_actions_msg(struct net_flow_action **a,
>>> + struct net_device *dev,
>>> + u32 portid, int seq, u8 cmd)
>>> +{
>>> + struct genlmsghdr *hdr;
>>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> + int err = -ENOBUFS;
>>> +
>>> + skb = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>>
>> genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> fixed along with the other cases.
small nit here, net_flow_build_actions_msg can be made static, it's
called only from within this file
few more nits... checkpatch --strict produces bunch of "CHECK: Please
use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations"
comments, I guess worth fixing too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists