[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150107103649.GN21820@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:36:49 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jon.maloy@...csson.com,
Paul.Gortmaker@...driver.com, erik.hugne@...csson.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] rhashtable: initialize atomic nelems
variable
On 01/07/15 at 06:26pm, Ying Xue wrote:
> I am not sure whether we really need to reinitialize atomic variable
> again although we have reset it with memset() or something else. But I
> see many places in kernel where we do this, for example:
>
> Although we use kmem_cache_zalloc() to allocate "net" structure instance
> in net_alloc(), there are still several places where to reinitialize its
> atomic variables again:
>
> setup_net()
> atomic_set(&net->use_count, 0);
>
> rt_genid_init()
> atomic_set(&net->ipv4.rt_genid, 0);
> atomic_set(&net->fnhe_genid, 0);
>
> Can you please definitely confirm that the reinitialisation is redundant
> for us?
I see examples for both, explicit initialization and dependence on
a previous memset. I'm not sure what is the preferred way.
I'll provide my ACK since this obviously doesn't break anything and
leave it up to Dave.
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists