netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150107111048.GP21820@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:10:48 +0000
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension

On 01/06/15 at 07:37pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Even it works ok, I think this struct layout is ugly.
> imo would be much easier to read if you replace
> the whole vxlanhdr with vxlanhdr_gbp
> or split vxlanhdr into two 32-bit structs.
> then __packed hacks won't be needed.

The main reason why I merged it into vxlanhdr is for documentation
purposes and to avoid duplicating the generic VXLAN header for every
extension. The RCO and GPE extensions would need to duplicate this
over and over. It gets messy in particular when multiple extensions
can be used in combination (such as GBP and RCO) which then each
have their own conflicting header definitions. This way, it is clear
which extensions are compatible by just looking at the definition
of the structure.

That said, I'm not married to this idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html