[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150108071308.GA16389@angus-think.lan>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:13:08 +0200
From: Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, thaller@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 2/2] iplink: print out addrgenmode attribute
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:04:39AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:10:36AM CET, stephen@...workplumber.org wrote:
> >On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:23:46 +0100
> >Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> >
> >> addrgenmode is currently write only by ip. So display this information
> >> if provided by kernel as well.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> >
> >Patch does not apply to current iproute2 git
>
> I made that against net-next branch. Which branch should I use for new
> features?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I am not sure if I am right, but seems to me that net-next should keep
features which depends on the next Linux headers version, and as I
understand these new headers are merged into net-next branch and after
into master. But I tried fix your patch on the master and it compiles
OK, so I assume that it can be based on master branch.
Regards,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists