[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150108001401.GG21149@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 00:14:01 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] vxlan: Allow for VXLAN extensions to be implemented
On 01/07/15 at 04:02pm, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Do you know how could GPE work with GBP they want to use the same bits
> in header for data? Seems like these are mutually exclusive
> extensions. RCO should be fine with either :-)
Yes, GBP and GPE are mutually exclusive extensions. Although
GPE would allow to define an intermediate header for additional
metadata, f.e. encoded as GUE or Geneve options.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists