[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1420729656.5947.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:07:36 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Sébastien Barré <sebastien.barre@...ouvain.be>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory Detal <gregory.detal@...ouvain.be>,
Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: avoid reducing cwnd when ACK+DSACK is
received
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:20 +0100, Sébastien Barré wrote:
> When the peer has delayed ack enabled, it may reply to a probe with an
> ACK+D-SACK, with ack value set to tlp_high_seq.
The most probable cause would not be a delayed ack (rto should be much
bigger), but a lost ACK.
> In the current code,
> such ACK+DSACK will be missed and only at next, higher ack will the TLP
> episode be considered done. Since the DSACK is not present anymore,
> this will cost a cwnd reduction.
>
> This patch ensures that this scenario does not cause a cwnd reduction, since
> receiving an ACK+DSACK indicates that both the initial segment and the probe
> have been received by the peer.
Do you have at hand a packetdrill test to demonstrate that the patch
works ?
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists