[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150112.164332.714842849672498427.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:43:32 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: cleanup bond_opts array
From: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:31:08 -0500
> Remove the empty array element initializer and size the array with
> BOND_OPT_LAST so the compiler will complain if more elements are in
> there than should be.
>
> An interesting unwanted side effect of this initializer is that if one
> inserts new options into the middle of the array then this initializer
> will zero out the option that equals BOND_OPT_TLB_DYNAMIC_LB+1.
>
> Example:
> Extend the OPTS enum:
> enum {
> ...
> BOND_OPT_TLB_DYNAMIC_LB,
> BOND_OPT_LACP_NEW1,
> BOND_OPT_LAST
> };
>
> Now insert into bond_opts array:
> static const struct bond_option bond_opts[] = {
> ...
> [BOND_OPT_LACP_RATE] = { .... unchanged stuff .... },
> [BOND_OPT_LACP_NEW1] = { ... new stuff ... },
> ...
> [BOND_OPT_TLB_DYNAMIC_LB] = { .... unchanged stuff ....},
> { } // MARK A
> };
>
> Since BOND_OPT_LACP_NEW1 = BOND_OPT_TLB_DYNAMIC_LB+1, the last
> initializer (MARK A) will overwrite the contents of BOND_OPT_LACP_NEW1
> and can be easily viewed with the crash utility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists