netdev - Re: why are IPv6 addresses removed on link down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150113.122542.815831933030545121.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:25:42 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dsahern@...il.com
Cc:	hannes@...hat.com, hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why are IPv6 addresses removed on link down

From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:53:59 -0700

> Bottom line is there a harm in removing the flush? If there is no harm
> will mainline kernel take a patch to do that or is your backward
> compatibility concern enough to block it?

Backward compatibility trumps all other concerns here, and I say is
enough to block changing the behavior.  One which we've had for more
than a decade.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html