netdev - Re: why are IPv6 addresses removed on link down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150112231021.316648e3@urahara>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 23:10:21 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why are IPv6 addresses removed on link down

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:06:44 -0700
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:

> We noticed that IPv6 addresses are removed on a link down. e.g.,
>    ip link set dev eth1
> 
> 
> Looking at the code it appears to be this code path in addrconf.c:
> 
>          case NETDEV_DOWN:
>          case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
>                  /*
>                   *      Remove all addresses from this interface.
>                   */
>                  addrconf_ifdown(dev, event != NETDEV_DOWN);
>                  break;
> 
> IPv4 addresses are NOT removed on a link down. Is there a particular 
> reason IPv6 addresses are?
> 
> Thanks,
> David

See RFC's which describes how IPv6 does Duplicate Address Detection.
Address is not valid when link is down, since DAD is not possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html