[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150114194137.GC2105@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:41:37 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, wkok@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: fix setlink/dellink notifications
On 01/13/15 at 10:48pm, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
> 2) Generate one notification from master and the other notification from
> self (This seems to be ideal):
> For master: the master driver will send notification (bridge in this
> example)
> For self: the self driver will send notification (rocker in the above
> example. It can use helpers from rtnetlink.c to do so. Like the
> ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink api).
>
> This patch implements 2) (leaving the 'rtnl_bridge_notify' around to be used
> with 'self').
>
> CC'ing others who might be affected by this change for review.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
I haven't digested this line by line yet but I agree that what you
describe above would be a good end state.
If I read the patch correctly then we would omit one notification
for the master case. Were both notifications exactly identical
previously?
This has the chance of breaking existing users terribly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists