[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150114091919.GB1869@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:19:19 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 2/2] tc: add support for BPF based actions
Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:19:17AM CET, stephen@...workplumber.org wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:47:24 +0100
>Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>> ---
>> include/linux/tc_act/tc_bpf.h | 31 +++++++
>
>The overall concept is fine, but the mechanics of file management
>gets in the way.
>
>All header files in the linux directory of iproute2 must come from sanitized
>version of kernel headers that are in uapi/linux in the kernel source.
>
>I take headers from 'make install_headers' and copy them over to keep
>in sync. The headers for master branch are kept in sync with upstream
>kernel (from Linus tree), and for net-next branch I derive them from Davem's
>net-next tree.
>
>If you want to use tc_bpf.h it has to be in upstream kernel first.
Sure. I will reposet these patches once act_bpf code is applied to
net-next kernel tree. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists