netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/6] selftests: Introduce minimal shared logic for running tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:53:10 -0700
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	mmarek@...e.cz, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, keescook@...omium.org, tranmanphong@...il.com,
	cov@...eaurora.org, dh.herrmann@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com, serge.hallyn@...ntu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, tim.bird@...ymobile.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, koct9i@...il.com,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] selftests: Introduce minimal shared logic for running
 tests

On 01/09/2015 02:06 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
> get the run_tests logic.
> 
> On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
> also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
> 
> However the key advantage is it will allow us to implement install very
> simply in a subsequent patch.
> 
> The default implementation just executes each program in $(TEST_PROGS).
> 
> We use a variable to hold the default implementation of $(RUN_TESTS)
> because that gives us a clean way to override it if necessary, ie. using
> override. The mount, memory-hotplug and mqueue tests use that to provide
> a different implementation.
> 
> Tests are not run via /bin/bash, so if they are scripts they must be
> executable, we add u+x to several.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>

I like the shared logic approach in general provided it leaves the
flexibility to not use the shared logic if a test have the need to
do so. This series requires some patch planning. shared logic patch
followed by individual test patches as opposed a single patch.

I would like to see the shared logic work done on top of my patch v4
series.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html