[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150116120232.GD10068@omega>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:02:35 +0100
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: fq_codel with 802.15.4 6LoWPAN fragmentation issue
Hi,
when using "fq_codel" as network scheduler, I noticed an issue with IEEE
802.15.4 6LoWPAN fragmentation. The issue is that high payloads IPv6
packets are dropped.
I detected the issue on the sending side which segments the 6LoWPAN
packet into several fragments.
In the IEEE 802.15.4 6LoWPAN fragmentation we have a 6LoWPAN interface
(MTU 1280) on top of an IEEE 802.15.4 interface (MTU 127). The 6LoWPAN
fragmentation algorithm creates in the "ndo_start_xmit" netdev_ops
callback function of the 6LoWPAN interface new sk_buffs for the
underlaying IEEE 802.15.4 interface (as skb->dev) and sends them via a
dev_queue_xmit.
IEEE 802.15.4 is a very slow connection and after each transmit there is
an "interframe spacing time" which depends on frequency setting. In my
testcase, that's about ~500 us for a payload above 18 bytes. This is
done by calling netif_stop_queue for the interface and start a timer
after each transmitted frame according to the interframe spacing time.
When the timer fires, it wakes the queue again by calling
netif_wake_queue.
Now: What I am noticed with fq_codel is that the code at [0] will drop
high payloaded IPv6 packets. Of course, if we have an IPv6 packet of
more than 1280 bytes payload we have a fragmentation (IPv6
fragmentation) over a fragmentation (802.15.4 6LoWPAN fragmentation).
When I increase the "params->interval" parameter I can send a "longer"
IPv6 packet depending how much I increase the "params->interval"
parameter.
I assume that the "params->interval" which defaults to MS2TIME(100) is
too small. I further assume that at the beginning of fragmentation the
interval measurement starts "vars->first_above_time = now +
params->interval;" (line 247 at [0]) and while sending several fragments
with the above mentioned interframe spacing time, the sending takes too
long and the skb will be dropped.
My questions are:
- What's the best way to deal with something like that?
- Is there a way to set the "params->interval" _per interface_? So I can
change the default parameter to a suitable value in the "ndo_init"
callback of the 6LoWPAN interface.
Thanks in advance.
- Alex
[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/net/codel.h#L248
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists