[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150117101309.GA19585@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:13:10 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"john.r.fastabend@...el.com" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
"josh@...htriplett.org" <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred
expansion/shrinking
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:51:46AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> I agree, however at least in the case of nftables you can easily do the same thing by adding millions of rules.
I think that's a problem in itself. If a single packet can kill
the CPU through millions of rules, then namespaces would be a joke.
There has to be a limit to the number of rules or the processing
has to be deferred into thread context (thus subject to scheduler
control) at some point.
> It doesn't make things worse.
So I don't think that's a valid justification for ignoring this
hash table problem.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists