[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421603317.11734.154.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:48:37 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eyal Perry <eyalpe@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Ido Shamay <idos@...lanox.com>,
Amir Ancel <amira@...lanox.com>,
Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: BW regression after "tcp: refine TSO autosizing"
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 18:22 +0200, Eyal Perry wrote:
>
> Please let me know if you see something in the results.
Getting high throughput on a single flow means lot of tweaking.
For a start, mlx4 is known to have interrupt mitigation that can hurt,
as the TX interrupt timer is restarted for every packet that is
delivered to the NIC.
ethtool -c ethX
..
tx-usecs: 16
tx-frames: 16
tx-usecs-irq: 0
tx-frames-irq: 256
...
-> TX IRQ can be delayed by 16*16 = 256 usec.
Can you try :
ethtool -C ethX tx-usecs 2 tx-frames 2
Or even
ethtool -C ethX tx-usecs 1 tx-frames 1
Interrupt mitigation is a trade-off.
If one customer wants high throughput on a single flow, then you might
remove interrupt mitigation.
If another customer wants cpu efficiency with thousand of flows, I guess
current mlx4 defaults are pretty good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists