netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] bonding: fix incorrect lacp mux state when agg not active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:50:48 -0500
From:	Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] bonding: fix incorrect lacp mux state when
 agg not active

On 1/19/15 2:26 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> index e9b706f..52a8772 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> @@ -471,10 +471,13 @@ static void __record_pdu(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct port *port)
>>   		 * and the port is matched
>>   		 */
>>   		if ((port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_MATCHED)
>> -		    && (lacpdu->actor_state & AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION))
>> +			&& (lacpdu->actor_state & AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION)) {
> In net/ it's preferred to have the logical operators at the end of the
> previous line. It'd be nice if we start fixing these in bond_3ad.c since
> they're being touched by the patch anyhow.

Ack, I prefer at the end too. Question, would it be acceptable to do the 
cleanup of the entire bond_3ad.c code in a separate patch? That way the 
fix vs. cleanup is clear.


>>   		case AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING:
>>   			if (!(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
>>   			    (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY) ||
>> -			    !(port->partner_oper.port_state & AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION)) {
>> +			    !(port->partner_oper.port_state &
>> +				AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) ||
>> +			    !(port->actor_oper_port_state &
>> +				AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION)) {
> IMO this one looks a bit confusing when broken up like that.

Ack, it seems in this case making checkpatch.pl happy should be secondary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html