| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:24:41 +0800 From: Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org> To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> Cc: Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e@...il.com>, wcn36xx <wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] net: wireless: wcn36xx: add wcn3620 chip type definition On 18 January 2015 at 22:17, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote: > Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org> writes: > >> Convert the list of chip types to an enum, add the default >> UNKNOWN type and a type for WCN3620 chip >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org> > > Please just use "wcn36xx: ", you should drop "net: wireless: " entirely. OK. Can you help me understand what you'd like to see happen with the chip variant detection stuff? There's a comment sent to one list only saying it might be preferable to keep the old detection code as the default. But there are no in-tree users of wcn36xx (mainly due to PIL not being in mainline, I guess). The old test's equivalence that AC == 3680 seems kind of weak to me and establishing the type must be passed in from platform code reflects the situation that there's no public way to detect the chip type from Qualcomm. In the second not-for-upstream series I use that to pass it in from DT, which is how it'd be normally used. -Andy > -- > Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists