netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: always fully coalesce guest Rx packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54BD408A.6080405@citrix.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:36:10 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	Jonathan Davies <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: always fully
 coalesce guest Rx packets

On 13/01/15 14:30, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 02:05:17PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Always fully coalesce guest Rx packets into the minimum number of ring
>> slots.  Reducing the number of slots per packet has significant
>> performance benefits (e.g., 7.2 Gbit/s to 11 Gbit/s in an off-host
>> receive test).
>>
> 
> Good number.
> 
>> However, this does increase the number of grant ops per packet which
>> decreases performance with some workloads (intrahost VM to VM)
> 
> Do you have figures before and after this change?

Some better (more rigorous) results done by Jonathan Davies shows no
regressions with full coalescing even without the grant copy
optimization, and a big improvement to single stream receive.

                         baseline    Full coalesce
Interhost aggregate      24 Gb/s     24 Gb/s
Interhost VM receive      7.2 Gb/s   11 Gb/s
Intrahost single stream  14 Gb/s     14 Gb/s
Intrahost aggregate      34 Gb/s     34 Gb/s

We do not measure the performance of dom0 to guest traffic but my ad-hoc
measurements suggest this may be 5-10% slower.  I don't think this is a
very important use case though.

So...

>> /unless/ grant copy has been optimized for adjacent ops with the same
>> source or destination (see "grant-table: defer releasing pages
>> acquired in a grant copy"[1]).
>>
>> Do we need to retain the existing path and make the always coalesce
>> path conditional on a suitable version of Xen?

...I think the answer to this is no.

>> ---
>>  drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h  |    1 -
>>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |  106 ++-----------------------------------
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
> 
> Love the diffstat!

Yes, it's always nice when you delete code and it goes faster... :)

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html