[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BDDF13.9010007@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:52:35 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@...networks.com>
To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@...il.com>,
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: stop sending PTB packets for MTU < 1280
Hi, Loganaden,
On 01/20/2015 01:02 AM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> Last time I was inquiring about depracated atomic fragments, people
> were concerned that there wasn't enough practical data to decide
> whether to go forward or not.
What kind of practical data?
FWIW,
<https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00.txt>
seems to be good enough when it comes to reasons for deprecating them.
Besides, please check Section 5.2 of
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-01.txt>
-- my "connection" to kernel.org was vulnerable to such attack.
> Would a sysctl with it turned on by default be a good option, until we
> are 100% sure ?
<https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00.txt>
was adopted by the 6man wg last November. While the I-D is not ready an
RFC, and there might be minor modifications, it seems that there's
agreement in not generating atomic fragments.
If you do want to have a sysctl for this, please make it default to "off".
Thanks!
Best regards,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@...networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists