netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: keep bond interface carrier off until at least one active member

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54BF38A9.7070608@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:27:05 -0500
From:	Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
CC:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: keep bond interface carrier off
 until at least one active member

On 1/19/15 5:15 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2015 7:57 AM, "Jonathan Toppins"
> <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com <mailto:jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>> wrote:
>  >
>  > From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com
> <mailto:sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>>
>
> Hmmmm, this feels a little creepy, sending a patch from my past.  I do
> appreciate the attribution, but I can't ACK or NACK or even comment as
> I've lost the context around this patch.  And I'm afraid I'll break out
> in hives if I look at the bonding code again, so if you don't mind,
> please remove me from this patch.  Thank you.
>

Have removed you for v2 of series, should we consider this a blanket 
statement for any other patches we might be releasing that you had a 
hand in? There were a few ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html