[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122230622.GA14472@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:06:23 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Dean Gehnert <deang@....com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
B38611@...escale.com, fabio.estevam@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] net: marvell: Fix highmem support on non-TSO path
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:49:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:27:31PM -0800, Dean Gehnert wrote:
> > Can you can try the SOCAT test on your Dove platform and see if that passes
> > the non-cache line aligned test case? I think what the SOCAT test does is
> > take the NFS "variable" out of the equation. My theory is that if there is a
> > DMA corruption, then hard telling what kinds of problems will occur. It
> > might be the payload of a file is corrupted, or if the NFS structures are
> > corrupted, it could manifest itself as a problem in the NFS code.
>
> Anyway, I'm running the test now, but I had to change the socat line to:
>
> # socat -b$(((1024*10)+1)) -u open:ExpectData.in TCP:192.168.1.212:4000
>
> The receiving end is getting:
>
> 4a4727232209b85badc1ca25ed4df222 -
> 4a4727232209b85badc1ca25ed4df222 -
> 4a4727232209b85badc1ca25ed4df222 -
> 4a4727232209b85badc1ca25ed4df222 -
> 4a4727232209b85badc1ca25ed4df222 -
> ...
It's been running for about an hour now with no sign of any problem.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists