[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122133713.GA25797@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:37:13 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, davem@...emloft.net,
gerlitz.or@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, ast@...mgrid.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 00/12] Flow API
On 01/22/15 at 01:52pm, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:26:13PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> > I believe I addressed all the comments so far except for the integrate
> > with 'tc'. I plan to work on the integration pieces next.
>
> I think that postponing the integration with 'tc' means that we're
> renouncing to provide some abstraction to represent the actions that
> the device provides. After this patch we'll have a standard API that
> exposes the vendor specific semantics, *so user configurations will
> not be portable anymore*.
>
> At least, we should come up with some abstraction / mapping as
> interface, so the vendors can use them to represent their operations.
> That interface will provide a trade-off: If the vendor offers an
> operation that doesn't map to our abstraction, then sorry that
> operation has to remain behind the curtain.
I thought this *is* the abstraction ;-) Can you elaborate on which
parts you consider vendor specific?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists