netdev - Re: net_test_tools: add ipv6 support for kbench

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:58:46 -0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: net_test_tools: add ipv6 support for kbench_mod

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:55:41AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/22/2015 11:12 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> ...
> >>>Yes, we need export the sysmbol for the test. Can we export the symbol?
> >>>or I can delete the route input test, which one do you prefer?
> >>
> >>There is no justification upstream to export that symbol since
> >>there are no modular users in-tree.
> >
> >I changed it to do the ip6_route_input test optionally. If the test is
> >required, somebody should change the kernel to export it and define
> >HAVE_IP6_ROUTE_INPUT in the test module. I thought this is fine for a
> >test module. How do you think?
> 
> See above, it can only be changed/exported from the kernel as long as
> there is an in-tree module making use of it.

Yes, I mean if I want to test it, I export the symbol in my test kernel,
not for upstream.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html