[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122224033.6e2db5ce@urahara>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:40:33 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: ipv6: Make address flushing on ifdown optional
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:17:19 -0700
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> Currently, ipv6 addresses are flushed when the interface is configured down:
>
> [root@f20 ~]# ip -6 addr add dev eth1 2000:11:1:1::1/64
> [root@f20 ~]# ip addr show dev eth1
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 02:04:11:22:33:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet6 2000:11:1:1::1/64 scope global tentative
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> [root@f20 ~]# ip link set dev eth1 up
> [root@f20 ~]# ip link set dev eth1 down
> [root@f20 ~]# ip addr show dev eth1
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 02:04:11:22:33:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> Add a new sysctl to make this behavior optional. Setting defaults to flush
> addresses to maintain backwards compatibility. When reset flushing is bypassed:
>
> [root@f20 ~]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth1/flush_addr_on_down
> [root@f20 ~]# ip -6 addr add dev eth1 2000:11:1:1::1/64
> [root@f20 ~]# ip addr show dev eth1
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 02:04:11:22:33:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet6 2000:11:1:1::1/64 scope global tentative
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> [root@f20 ~]# ip link set dev eth1 up
> [root@f20 ~]# ip link set dev eth1 down
> [root@f20 ~]# ip addr show dev eth1
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 02:04:11:22:33:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet6 2000:11:1:1::1/64 scope global
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> inet6 fe80::4:11ff:fe22:3301/64 scope link
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> Suggested-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
Would this break existing application expecting a particular semantic
by listening to netlink? What happens to packets received with the static
address when interface is down? With IPv4 Linux is mostly a weak host
model, and IPv6 somewhere in between.
For vendors that control the application stack or have limited number
of services this would work fine, but what about RHEL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists