[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150123.010008.319675287744637375.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:00:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: therbert@...gle.com
Cc: vincent.jardin@...nd.com, jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] openvswitch: Add STT support.
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:24:15 -0800
> STT is undoubtedly a creative and unique solution I'll give you that,
> but the potential repercussions of allowing this to be widely deployed
> are profound. IMO this needs to be fully explored before it can ever
> be allowed in the kernel. If there has already been discussion on this
> please forward a pointer (I didn't find anything in the IETF mailing
> list archives other than the draft posting announcements), but at the
> minimum these patches warrant a lot of scrutiny.
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists