[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1422189993.2148036.218504993.339586EE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:46:33 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: allow explicitly choosing optimistic
addresses
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 08:02, Erik Kline wrote:
> if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ifp->addr, addr) &&
> - !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE) &&
> + (!(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE) ||
> + ifp->flags&IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC) &&
> + !(ifp->flags&banned_flags) &&
> (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
Can the wrapper take the IFA_F_TENTATIVE and IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC into the
banned_flags argument, so this condition becomes easier to read? The new
caller could also specify them verbatim. I think it would improve
readability.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists