netdev - Re: CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150125194435.GA12981@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:44:35 +0300
From:	Oleg <lego12239@...dex.ru>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROCFS

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:22:09PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Oleg <lego12239@...dex.ru> wrote:
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack procfs file is marked as obsolete in the recent
> > kernels. What's wrong with it? Or it's simply a new fashion to replace
> > simple file interface with anything else?
> 
> proc has several drawbacks vs. ctnetlink:
>  - not extensible

In the what way?
Sorry, but i think that limitations isn't in proc, but in a human fantasy.

>  - doesn't have ability to query for particular items

What about something like:

exec 3<>nf_conntrack; echo show tcp dport 12345 >&3; cat <&3
HERE_WE_GET_NEEDED_ENTRIES
exec 3<&-

?

>  - no add/delete support

What about simple:

echo add ENTRY > nf_conntrack
echo delete ENTRY > nf_conntrack

?

>  - no event notification (e.g. conntrack -E)

Florian, are you seriosly? What's wrong with simple:

cat nf_conntrack_event

?

Moreover, all things i have wrote save already existent scripts works.

May be i don't understand anything? Please correct me if so.

P.S. netlink is really cool thing, but i think we go in the wrong way.

-- 
Nemanov Oleg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html