[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150125.233316.1272794874104313977.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:33:16 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] bridge: simplify br_getlink() a bit
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:22:35 +0300
> Static checkers complain that we should maybe set "ret" before we do the
> "goto out;". They interpret the NULL return from br_port_get_rtnl() as
> a failure and forgetting to set the error code is a common bug in this
> situation.
>
> The code is confusing but it's actually correct. We are returning zero
> deliberately. Let's re-write it a bit to be more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists