netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:09:50 +0000
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David.Laight@...LAB.COM, ying.xue@...driver.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*

On 27.01, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:16:04AM +0000, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > 
> > No objection. I have a patch prepared which allows the user to
> > provide ht->mutex himself so nfset can provide its own existing
> > mutex to rhashtable and lock out the resizes from inserts,
> > removals and dump iterations automatically That would restore the
> > old behaviour of the nfset API without major surgery.
> 
> If you take the mutex you might as well just make it synchronous.
> There is zero difference.
> 
> Maybe you misunderstood my email.  I'm not making it synchronous
> for everybody, just those that always take a lock on inserts/removals
> and therefore don't need per-bucket locks.

Actually I have a patchset queued that adds runtime additions and
removals, both active and timeout based. So netfilter won't have
pure synchronous behaviour anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html