[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1422369481.29618.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:38:01 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: vyasevic@...hat.com
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO
segmentation if not set.
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:26 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> That's what I originally wanted to do, but had to move and grow txflags thus
> skb_shinfo ended up growing. I wanted to avoid that, so stole an skb flag.
>
> I considered treating fragid == 0 as unset, but a 0 fragid is perfectly valid
> from the protocol perspective and could actually be generated by the id generator
> functions. This may cause us to call the id generation multiple times.
With 32bit ID, you certainly can replace fragid=0 by fragid=0x80000000
and nobody will notice.
I certainly vote for not adding an extra bit in skb or skb_shared_info,
considering we already consume 32bits for this thing.
fragid are best effort, otherwise they would have 128bits.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists